| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Canada (Labour Relations Board) v Paul L'Anglais Inc ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Canada (Labour Relations Board) v Paul L'Anglais Inc
''Canada (Labour Relations Board) v Paul L'Anglais Inc'' () 1 S.C.R. 147 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada constitutional decision on the jurisdiction of the superior courts to hear constitutional arguments. The unanimous Court found that Courts of Inherent Jurisdiction such as the Quebec Superior Court had concurrent jurisdiction to hear constitutional cases.
==Background==
A series of companies were involved in the production of several television shows and sold air time to sponsors. The CUPE union brought a claim against the companies to Canada Industrial Relations Board. CUPE applied to have the companies declared a single party for the purposes of a collective bargaining proceedings. The companies argued that it was impossible as some of them were not inter-provincial companies and thus were outside of federal jurisdiction.
The CLRB found that the companies were a federal undertaking and so granted CUPE's application. The companies, in turn, applied to the Quebec Superior Court for a writ of evocation. The Superior Court denied the application on grounds that they did not have jurisdiction as the Federal Court Act gave the power to hear this sort of case to the Federal Court. On appeal to the Quebec Court of Appeal the court held that the Superior Court had jurisdiction and granted the writ of evocation.
The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the Superior Court had jusidction over constitutional issues.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Canada (Labour Relations Board) v Paul L'Anglais Inc」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|